FAILURE

WHAT THE MUSIC BUSINESS IS BEST AT

Despite all its talk of dreams and destiny, the music industry is really a vast machine for manufacturing disappointment. Failure isn’t the exception — it’s the default setting. Most songs vanish unheard, most careers gently implode, and the ratio of failure to success makes Russian roulette look like a sensible investment strategy.

The whole thing runs on delusion. Even after they get a record contract, new artists still face odds about equal to an office raffle. For hopefuls at an open-mic night the odds are near lottery jackpot level. In the music business, hope is the fuel; failure the most familiar destination.

Record companies, of course, know this and always have done. The entire business model depends on it. One act in ten must sell enough to cover the cost of the other nine. The rest are ballast — success funds failure, failure reinforces success. Everyone at the table knows the numbers, but they keep on playing because a win, when it comes, pays for everything else — the champagne, the limos, the lawsuits, the therapy.

The industry’s mythology was born in the pre-streaming era, the age of mad spending and ruthless culls. The key to the mythology was the record company’s need to sign the best new artists before anyone else did. That meant signing them early and funding their development. It was from that expensive, hopeful stage that the image of the music business — the one that still lingers — was formed.

For young artists, their first contract was like divine intervention. Statistically, it was simply a 90% guarantee they were going to fail. No one ever said so — the champagne corks popped and the photographs were taken. If they were lucky, perhaps for a year or so they’d get rehearsal rooms, studio time, hotel minibars and daydreams. Then the call would come through saying the next album “isn’t happening.”

The music industry’s A&R men, many of them middle-class romantics, always had a weakness for bright personalities. They frequently mistook self-confidence for star quality, and intelligence for creativity. However, if you were not a “real” artist — a bi-polar obsessive — but just another competent young optimist who thought they’d have a go, failure in the music industry could at least be an education that money alone could never buy.

The 1980s were golden years for this. Record companies were drunk on optimism and cash. Advances were generous enough that new bands could afford mortgages and good shoes. For every Led Zeppelin there were ten “next Led Zeppelins,” each given six months in a studio to try and prove they could be the elusive 1 out of 10. When it didn’t work, they went home with what was left of their advances and a sharper grasp of human nature. The music business lost money, but it minted competent adulthood.

In 1983, Ricky Gervais signed to London Records with his band Seona Dancing. The clothes were immaculate and the videos glossy. But the sales were dismal. “We had everything except fans,” said Gervais. But failure was formative. Ten years on he was writing The Office, a sitcom about people who mistake receiving a small amount of attention for success.

Physicist Brian Cox joined the rock band Dare. They signed to A&M with all the trimmings — recorded in LA, got tour support, and made videos that cost more than a semi-detached house. When the second album flopped, Cox realised he was more interested in how sounds behave than how pop stars behave. He went back to university, took a PhD, and became television’s most engaging physicist.

Between those two stories sits the morality play of the 20^th Century music business – bright kids, modest trauma, cheerful recovery. The great myth of pop was that it destroyed people. It didn’t. Mostly, it educated them — quickly, but expensively. For every star who ever ended up in rehab there were dozens of industry “failures” who used the experience to create a successful career. The process of being signed and hyped, then dropped, delivered every lesson a business affairs college could deliver — public speaking, budgeting, creative teamwork, crisis management, and the ability to smile convincingly while being lied to.

Many of those who failed as pop stars emerged from the experience steadier, more mature, and more employable. People who once played the Marquee found themselves able to organise corporate meetings or run law firms. They brought stage-honed calm to the boardroom and had an instinct for bluff that could only be learned from having watched their single die on the day of release.

In the pre-streaming era, the music business was hard to hate. Its aptitude for failure deserved our respect. It didn’t just manufacture stars; it took in inexperienced adolescents and returned them to the world as articulate adults, able to handle deadlines, rejection, and difficult clients, the same way they once handled their A&R man. Their records would soon be forgotten, but they went on to be far more use to the world than they would have been had the industry succeeded with them — authors, doctors, lawyers, architects — the mayor of New York, the Prime Minister of Japan.

Today’s music industry has largely cut that out. The mechanics of A&R have shifted. Now, before they’re signed, artists have to show a sizeable fan base on TikTok or YouTube. And as marketing budgets increase, development budgets disappear, along with the industry’s well-funded University of Life.

For record companies, the results are the same — profits flow from just 10% of their signed artists while 80% fail completely. But something has been lost. The old system, for all its waste and cynicism, took naive adolescents, gave them a good time, and returned them as articulate, resilient adults. There was value in failure. And fun.

Today’s industry is more cost-conscious. And much of the joy has been lost. It’s as good as ever at manufacturing disappointment. But it’s cut out the benefits.

FREE WEEKLY UPDATES

CLICK SUBSCRIBE AND LEAVE YOUR EMAIL